DRAGON錯誤的車葉方向

 

 

During the process of Dragon1/700 CG-60.I found some mistakes on this kit.Most of mistakes maybe according to the wrong documents ,or some other mistakes  considered that on the strength of tech and cost of model design.

就在製作Dragon這1/700 CG-60的當中,逐步地發現到幾個問題.關於實艦結構的考證誤失雖然不少,但畢竟都是可以諒解的.也許是開模技術,也許是成本考量.

But there is a absonant problem in the all kits of Dragon 2 shifts-ship products .It is about the angle of propellers.

Propellers of Real ship designed by the same way of machanical-nology and physiconology.So it must be designed to inversive angel at the left and the right propeller.But after check on the all  Dragon 1/700 and 1/350 kits,we can see that they are same angle on two propellers.That's wrong,and I believe that can be easy design at the plan before into the marketplace.But Dragon did not.

I hope this problem can be solved by Dragon at their ship dies.   

然而有一個地方的誤失很明顯都絕非上述的原因造成,並且同樣的錯誤均出現在Dragon多項艦船產品之中,這是讓小弟百思不解而且不能諒解的.那就是車葉的角度問題!仔細觀察手上每一件Dragon雙軸輸出的艦艇模型產品可以發現,在這個部分,Dragon的車葉方向刻模都是同向的,而且每一個產品都是同一個方向,無法流用替代.這是錯誤的!2具車葉應該是反向推進,所有艦艇設計在這個方面都一樣,因為面對的是一樣的流體與物理原理.

 

然而Dragon的產品卻可以顯而易見全作成同向了.這個問題已非是針對單艦的考證了,而是物理邏輯.所有的船面對的都是一樣的流體物理設計,並非個案.在刻模的設計開發上,應當是可以非常簡易而不造成任何困擾的考量在裡頭.我想,造成這個在該社艦船產品中普遍存在的錯誤只有一個原因,就是偷懶!!希望Dragon能重視這個問題,在往後的模具或產品上能夠修正過來.

DRAGON 1/700 TICONDEROCA CLASS KIT

(CG-60 NORMANDY)

 

 

DRAGON 1/700 SPRUANCE CLASS KIT

(DDG-979 CONOLLY)

 

 

DRAGON 1/350 Arleige Burke IIA KIT

(DDG-92 MOMSEN)