USS HANCOCK Process-4
Build ship-body 不做不知道,這艘的組裝性和密合度不是很好,膠版塞縫,三秒膠暴力接合,什麼都用上了...... 看來後續的作業很有苦頭吃的,小號手...........真的該加強了,不是什麼都出1/350的就好的,組裝性跟密合度,還有細緻度也該隨著比例增加啊....~唉.. 艦艏升降甲板與右舷側的製作設定,未來大概就是這樣的效果的. 模型製作的好習慣,先不要粘死,在過程中要不斷的假組看看. 內構以膠板和膠條追加了肋骨與初步的管線 要做這一隻的話真的要小心,密合度很不好,再三假組並研究過相關位置確認沒問題後再粘死會比較保險的. 左舷側的開口並不向右舷那樣大,原則上並不做成開啟狀. 艦艏的構型相當漂亮
您居然拿了?
回覆刪除不過經由您的手就不會是原本如玩具模樣!
期待您得空開工!
咱大清朝有這樣ㄉ船艦啊???
回覆刪除那英國ㄉ是長怎樣??
為什麼會怕他們?
?_?*
英國戰艦英弗來息白(Inflexible ."不屈")號
回覆刪除http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Inflexible_%281876%29
當代世界最大的戰艦 . 定遠在設計時也一定程度地參考了它和德國薩克森級的設計
確實
當時定鎮遠的性能堪為一時之選
但當代船艦進步速度一日千里
此構型的戰艦很快就顯得落伍了
特別是十九世紀末登場的前無畏艦
性能足以直接將定遠這類的戰艦打為前世代產物
Ushain兄
回覆刪除拿了拿了~~
作為中華民族的後代,海軍艦艇的熱愛者....該拿啦~~
開工,也是一定要滴~~
^^||
小花
怕的不是別人,就怕是自己.....
@@||
真主之劍
真佩服您對船艦的熱愛,以及考證的精神!
以您而言,難得難得~~
也感謝您詳細的說明喔~~
^^
Dear Ralph,
回覆刪除Thank you for the review.
I found this related site quiet interesting:
http://www.hksw.org/Ting%20Yuen.htm
Can anyone explain why a 1:1 replica of that ship was made?
technology always improving...
回覆刪除Best ship from 10 years ago... is not best ship now...
most nation, constantly upgrade their navy warship, either hardware or software....
even China...
I don't know about Taiwan tho.... it seems.. Taiwan is not investing anything in military any more.....
perhaps it is good... lets not show any aggression to china, perhaps China will spare our daily life....
看到"古代"ㄉ戰艦
回覆刪除感覺現代ㄉ戰艦輕盈許多
所以~~~瘦身還是有其必要性
>"
Dear Dr_Who2
回覆刪除Thank you so much for your always favors.^^
I know that 1:1 TING YUEN replica ,she was built for "Jia Wu War"(The First Sino-Japanese War) museum on Wei Hai city in China.
Dear joe
Thanks for comment.
I'm sorry for that I don't really understand what you mean.
Do you mean in scale model?or in real military equipments?
There were many scale models about Taiwanese military designed and released.
It's same as real equipments.
TO 小花
是因為造艦技術與武器日益精進,戰術思想也不一樣,因此也改變了軍艦設計的理念與相關尺寸.
看到衝角,讓我想到一個問題:同樣都是鋼鐵艦的情況,這個衝角還有作用嗎?鋼板稍微厚一點的話,不就沒用了?
回覆刪除